Y'know, the only thing that bothers me about these discussions is when something becomes a "flaw" because it's not how someone else might do it. I've gone over your message, and frankly, what you say is a flaw is NOT a flaw. It's the most logical approach we could come up with. You use the zero-G cargo bay for huge, heavy objects and crates and god knows what where you need weightlessness. People don't weigh very much. You also don't have to worry about pumping in air in most cases; you can leave it fairly open, let the ships dock nearby, shuttle in the cargo right into the top bay, and move on. You say that it's hard to dock in the center because it's moving, but I'd point out that in space, EVERYTHING is moving. Even to dock in or use the zero-G area, a ship has to stop and orient itself to that area. Everything in space is moving relative to everything else. There isn't much difference involved for the approaching ship. When a ship enters the regular bay, it moves further in and is in essence "grabbed" and lowered into any of a number of various docking and cargo bays. The deeper the cargo bay, the more gravity. So you can adjust as you go. Also, this way, instead of having what is in essence one big garage (the zero-G cargo bay), you can shunt ships off by their category (civilian vs. military, alien vs. human atmosphere) to the appropriate bays. You don't have to worry about shuttling people through zero-G once they leave their ships; they're in atmosphere, and on the "ground," where they can then get into a proper line to go through customs. It's a *controlled environment*, which is what you want in a customs area, not everybody floating around everywhichway. There are another half-dozen reasons why it's constructed this way, but those are the primary ones. So frankly, I have to disagree with you: it is most definitely NOT a design flaw. And not to be persnickety, but before classifying something a "flaw" in a message, you might consider next time asking why something is the way it is. If I can answer your question logically, then it's not a flaw. If I can't, then it is. (Ditto to just going on this as an assumption that it IS a flaw, and then asking for additional, as though this were simply a given. It isn't.) jms |
|