>It doesn't get to me except when I am barraged with accusations that
>want to destroy the environment, starve the poor and give all the money to
>the rich. There are
>balanced approaches to every problem but it seems the media and others prefer
>to dwell on the
>extreme sides of issues
Okay, so that being the case, please show us evidence as to the
-- helping the environment
-- feeding the poor
-- not giving money to the rich.
If you say it's unfair to portray them in the former light, then the latter
light must be true, yes? So please, fire away, show us the information to back
Because there's spin and there's spin, and cutting money to, say, an agency
that feeds people is not a matter of spin, it's x dollars this year vs. y
dollars last year. Time after time, Bush has *said* he's for one
"compassionate" cause after another, but when it came time to allocate money or
support, was nowhere to be found...he applauds the theory but dismantles them
behind the scenes by starving them.
So please, you've made the assertion that republicans are being unfairly
tainted with these former allegations, so show me where the latter are true.
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)