>>There was a better way... see all Saddam had to do was comply with the
>>Nations resolutions, but he didnt...
>>This war is on Saddams shoulders... he had so many chances to prevent it,
>>chose not to.
The problem, of course, is that Iraq would have to prove a negative, which is
not possible. You cannot *prove* someone does not have WMD. If they looked in
95% of every spot in the country, they could aways say it was in the remaining
5%. Even Rumsfeld said "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)