>This is an over-narrow view of what defines a creative work. I wouldn't call
>a textbook "art", per se, but it's no less worthy of copyright. The author
>puts effort into condensing material and spends time working on the clarity
And textbooks are indeed protected by copyright.
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)