>>There was a better way... see all Saddam had to do was comply with the
>United
>>Nations resolutions, but he didnt...
>>
>>This war is on Saddams shoulders... he had so many chances to prevent it,
>but
>>chose not to.

The problem, of course, is that Iraq would have to prove a negative, which is
not possible. You cannot *prove* someone does not have WMD. If they looked in
95% of every spot in the country, they could aways say it was in the remaining
5%. Even Rumsfeld said "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of
absence."


jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)