>The character of Kirk, in the produced version of "City on the Edge of
>Forever," was by no means "card-board," or lacking in dimension, and it is
>perhaps only the Ellison bootlicks who would even try making such an
>erroneous
>claim.

1) So anyone who disagrees with your point of view is a bootlick? Does the
phrase ad hominum attack ring a bell?

2) Someone who just came out a few days ago with a totally false rumor about
Harlan drinking, who only recanted when forced up against a wall, should be
careful when throwing around the term "erroneous claim."

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com