{original post had no questions}

Er...there was *zero* CGI in that scene.

jms

{original post unavailable}

Yes...the CGI ref was to a fake Lyta head...and there wasn't
one. The streams aren't technically considered CGI as we use it.
That's roto work.

jms

Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> asks:
> So the light beams streaming from Lyta to Kosh 2 as 'he' leaves
> were done with cel animation then?

No, the streams were done on a flint, and there were not two
takes edited together, there was just the one continuous take.

jms

SUSAN F. KIRN <76262.2013@compuserve.com> asks:
> I was curious to know if you have story approval over these and
> if the are considered B5 *canon* (for want of a better word)?

In the past, we've tried to keep them canon in the broad
strokes, though in the details things fall out. The new batch, though,
are being kept much closer to continuity....

jms

{original post unavailable}

CGI is specifically graphics generated on a computer, usually
2d or 3d animation. Roto work like the streams from Lyta's eyes are
done by hand, frame by frame.

jms

{original post unavailable}

You're hallucinating....

jms

{original post unavailable}

Yes, but those are rarely worth talking about....

jms