TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 7/25/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> asks:
> Your show in an issue where Trek was also focused on??!!

I stay off the road for the good of the commonweal; it's not
something I feel is negotiable, just personally. It's unquestionably a
pain in the butt.

jms



TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 7/26/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


{original post had no questions}

The show has been an uphill battle from the first day until
today. After a while, you just kinda get used to it.

jms



TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 7/28/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


{original post unavailable}

It's common today, in our age of cynicism, to deride anything in
which the people involved feel passionately about what they do. We
should all be laid back, do it for the money, just churn out sausage
between commercials; if you get passionate about something, you're told
to chill out, because passion is passe.

jms



TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 8/2/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


{original post had no questions}

Yup...well said.

jms



TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 8/3/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks:
> Did you say WB was interested in a spinoff?

Yes, they seem interested.

jms



TV GUIDE article

 Posted on 8/4/1996 by J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> to CIS


{original post had no questions}

"I figured everybody in Hollywood would be rooting to get you out of
television"

Well...*almost* everybody....

jms