SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards

 Posted on 11/22/1999 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated


I think that we have a British/American misunderstanding here, because the
gesture reported is not designated as one that calls the person asking the
question a "wanker," at least not in this country, though it may be in the UK.
It's more meant here as indicating that the person talking doesn't have a clue
and is just jerking around with the answer.

Though it's a moot point, since SFX is a fairly useless publication on just
about every imaginable front. Never have so many jumped-up fanboys done so
little, with so much, for so long.

Wankers.

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com



SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards

 Posted on 11/23/1999 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated


>Maybe now they aren't <that> good. Most of their crimes are those of
>self-indulgence, and self-congratulation.

Having been a journalist myself, I also kind of have a problem with an editor
of a publication using that publication as a tool in a fanboy vendetta. But
that's just me, I'm whacky that way.


jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com



SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards

 Posted on 11/27/1999 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated


Paul...

Re: your synopsis.

Marry me.

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com