{original post unavailable}

I just kinda thought it was a cool sounding name....

jms

{original post unavailable}

See, Burhaan, this is what makes me nuts.

When we have shows like "Rumors" or "Epiphanies" lots of people
post message saying, "What's wrong with the show, it was going great
and now it's slowed down." Then we have a show like "Fire" or
"Surrender" and then lots of people start posting messages saying
"What's wrong with the show, it's going too fast."

It's like having a driver sitting behind you in the car
alternately saying "Speed up! Slow down! Faster! Slower!"

Yes, some threads have been isolated from year 5 a bit, but all
in the accelleration has not been overmuch; year 4 would've ended at
418 in the original notes, so you're only looking at 4 episodes
difference.

This is the latter part of the story no matter how you look at
it; so you have to start speeding things up a bit in places because
that's what the latter half of a novel is *for*. Let's all remember
basic literature 101: introduction, rising action, complication, climax
and denouement. It gets tenser and faster the deeper you get into it.

Why this is striking people as unexpected is utterly beyond me.

jms

{original post unavailable}

Hadn't considered that prospect; who knows, you could be right.

jms

{original post had no questions}

"the way in which you broaden themes by making apparent antagonists
sympathetic while consistently creating a plausible future history is
nothing short of amazing."

Thanks. That really is a large part of the fun for me.

jms

{original post unavailable}

It was a perfectly *fine* question...don't worry about it. My
reply was more oriented toward the recent series of inquiries than
yours. Remember, sometimes the only way to get pertinent information is
to ask impertinent questions.

jms