>An example in B5 context: what if I posted "JMS, I think the
>overall quality of Season 5 has suffered substantially because of
>a lack of good dialogue editting." Is that a flame?

Nope.

>What if I said,
>"I think JMS suffers from Tom Clancy syndrome sometimes, and the
>quality of the show would improve if someone less personally attached
>to every word of dialogue were brought in to edit."

Annoying, but not a flame.
> Or what if
>I said "The ending of the Shadow War sucked! Why on earth would these
>two exceedingly powerful species suddenly start listening to our
>opinions and meekly taking our suggestions? Totally ruined my
>suspension of disbelief!"? Is that a troll?

Nope.

jms

From: (jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com