The J. Michael Straczynski Message Archive


JMSNews provides an archive of messages posted
by J. Michael Straczynski (JMS).

  Home      Community Forums      Contest      Links      FAQ      About JMS     

RSS Feed  

 Search all Messages

   Sort by: 

This field searches the text of all messages in the archive.

    From: (Jms at B5)
 Subject: From jms Re: Jerry Doyle hopeful of B5 revival
    Date: 9/9/2003 7:05:00 PM  

  << Newer  : List :  Older >>

View Thread
(4 messages)

Forgive the repost in case the other note doesn't get through....

So there's a response on from Jerry to the discussion t=
took place here about his statements on that system that he was putting
together a follow-up to B5 as a series. I thought I'd repost what I just=
to the folks who posted his reply, as well as Jerry's comments, unaltered=
.. =20

My comments are prefaced by the > character.


To quote from the note from Jerry, and respond, with my responses in ital=
I'm not one for chat rooms or newsgroups, but this was brought to my atte=
by numerous people, and here's my response=E2=80=A6

F*** Joe and his typical controlling bull****.
>Well, at least we've defined the terms of the discussion.

I guess Doug Netter hasn't been talking to me or the "radio guy" or whoev=
>Doug returned Jerry's call, yes. We do that when our cast members call.=
to my knowledge there have been no talks between Doug and the "radaio guy=
Which is exactly what I'd said.
I guess Doug didn't send demographics and related data to the "radio guy".
>Jerry asked us to send information, information was sent. That doesn't =
anything to do with anything that I said in my notes on the newsgroup.
I guess Doug is lying when he told me he's had conversations with the "ra=
guy" and that Joe already has some ideas on paper.=20
>It's clear that someone has their wires crossed, yes. But to go back to=
I'd said: if someone has the clout to make a deal, I'm here to talk to th=
whilch again is what I'd said. But no one has yet come to either Doug or
myself with anything close to that. I've never done any work based on so=
me guy
in Chicago who thinks he can make something happen with Jerry. =20
I guess I didn't fly out to Chicago to meet with the "radio guy" in the m=
of August.=20
>I never said he didn't. What Jerry does or doesn't do on his own time, =
his own dime, is Jerry's business. This is a case of Jerry defending him=
from an accusation that I never made. All I've ever said is that nobody =
yet come to us with anything resembling a deal, or shown the potential to=
a deal happen.
Oh by the way, the "radio guy", he's the NUMBER ONE syndicator in the cou=
and has strong ties to the head of Fox. I guess that's something else I m=
>Again, this has nothing to do with what was said. I didn't say this guy
wasn't a syndicator of any level, and never said he didn't have ties to F=
So once more Jerry is setting up a straw man argument to defend something=
was simply never implied or stated. =20

Joe can say what he wants. He can spout his crap about how "he's the man"
around which all things B5 spin.=20
>Well, yeah, I did create the series, executive produce it, write 91 out =
of 110
episodes, and I do control many of the rights. And no deal can go forwar=
without my involvement. By contract, if it doesn't happen with me, it do=
happen. I still don't see what that has to do with anything, however. =20
At least I'm still trying to bring back what should never have been taken=
the air. The fans deserve the show.=20
>I've never said anything to the contrary. I've said, and I'll say it ag=
here, that I'll listen to anybody who has the wherewithal to put a deal
together. So far that hasn't happened, despite Jerry's pronouncements. =
pointed that fact out. That is the only fact that Jerry hasn't dealt wit=
here, apparently finding it easier to respond to things I didn't say than=
things I did say, which is odd, but there you go.
Joe's ego deserves a much bigger person.
>Some things deserve a response, some things don't. This is one of the l=
He hasn't refuted anything I said, which was that Jerry has talked a lot=
a lot of prospects, but to date none of them have materialized. If I wer=
wrong, then something would have been put forward. That's simply a state=
of fact, ego has nothing to do with it. =20

Feel free to post this from where it came. I'm tired of all the bull****.
>I'm glad that Jerry has taken this opportunity to vent. Clearly, he mis=
the show and wants it to come back. We all miss the show. But at the sa=
time, it's not fair to the fans that Jerry mentions to get people excited=
something that doesn't exist. I'm glad that he is trying to get things g=
for himself and with others, but talking about things doesn't make them s=
o, and
pointing this out is not inappropriate when, based on those statements, I=
my email box filled with inquiries about things that simply aren't happen=
I've worked with the online community for ten years now, talking about B5=
being painfully honest about what's going on. =20
>If there were something going on involving a return of the series that w=
real, I'd be the first person to talk about it and let people know. But =
isn't. I have to be honest with people, because I have ten years worth o=
reputation and credibility with the fans to protect. I see that Jerry do=
like that, but I can't change that now because he's offended. And again,=
the end of the day, it comes down to this: Jerry says he's got something =
that's real. If he does, and makes it happen, then I look like a fool, w=
I'm okay with, it wouldn't be the first time. Then he's right to be offe=
If he doesn't, and he can't...then on what possible basis can one be offe=
>Just a thought or two for anyone looking on.
>Joe Straczynski

(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,=20
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine=20
and don't send me story ideas)

Site © 2015 Midnight Design Productions  -  Message content © 2015 by Synthetic Worlds  -  Privacy Statement