>I meant that only as the difference between potential and reality.
>Potential would have had B5 only 4 seasons long and maybe syndicated
>scattershot across the countries various TV station. The reality had it
>being 5 seasons long and continually syndicated since 1998 on an
>individual superstation that is seen by a wider audience.
>The critics would latch on to the "potential" revenue lost to actors
>residuals by B5 only having exclusive rights to one station. The reality
>means B5 has had continual exposure with occasional efforts to add in new
>blood. This could mean when it is given to the open market, more
>stations will latch onto it for broadcast.
>Of course, this was my interpretation of the matter. The writers and
>actors have a better position to form an opinion on the matter since the
>results affect their livelyhoods.
It doesn't really work that way.
You're paid on the rerun qua rerun, not on the number of stations carrying it.
WB makes a deal with whomever...a syndicator, a cable network, somebody...and
that organization pays X-dollars per episode for the right to show it for the
length of that contract (usually about 3-5 years).
There's a slightly different residual formula for cable vs. syndication, but
rather than get bogged down in that, let me get to the point.
If an episode runs on a thousand stations or twenty, the residual is the same,
a percentage of the purchase price of the episode. So the number of stations
really doesn't matter.
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)