>>Care to back that one up, binky?
>>So what'll it be, sport?
>Namecalling is so unbecoming, in my opinion, especially in a case like
>this one, where the facts can speak for themselves.
So post a few and let 'em speak for themselves, 'cause so far you have failed
to do so. You made a claim that you had to now back off on a bit, that they
ddn't knowingly hire plagiarists, then went on to make some more wild claims.
How can the facts you defer to so greatly be appreciated for all their glory
when you seem incabable of posting them in respond to a direct request?
Seems odd, one might almost think you didn't *have* any such facts.
Which would be silly, wouldn't it?
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)