>Anthony Brookshire (SpeedMchV@netscape.net) wrote:
>
>>Zog <zogstar67@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:eae7b338.0201131332.74598913@posting.google.com...
>>> Steve Parker <sparker9@attbi.com> wrote in message
>>news:<0c5r3u0c1e1gp3qh0f9161qdh8vjmcgofk@4ax.com>...
>>> (Don't forget, next issue is the belated Mute-Month
>>> > issue and Straczynski had better not cop-out and have the
>>> > confrontation between the May and Peter in the Mute-Month issue. If
>>> > *ANY* story ever demanded dialogue, it's this one.)
>>> >
>>> Someone tell me this isn't true. I agree with the above sentiment
>>wholeheartedly!
>>
>>I agree that it shouldn't be, but I believe it will.
>
>So the last line of ASM #37 (it's not a spoiler--the cliffhanger from #35
>didn't progress this issue), Aunt May's "We need to talk, Peter. Right now,"
>is
>just the set-up to a joke with the 'Nuff Said issue the punchline? If that's
>true, it'll be a major disappointment.
>
>--Doug Tonks
>_____
Since nobody actually *asked* if it's true...
No, it's not true.
#38 is the big talk between Peter and May. And it's pretty intense.
#39, after their conversation, is the silent issue.
jms
(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas) |
|
