>Inverse: "If a comic isn't on this list, it's not worth reading."
>Johanna does NOT have to obey this rule. The inverse of a statement
>does NOT follow logically from that statement. We must judge its
>truth or falsehood independently of the original statement.

Except of course that's not what I said. I said that the implication is that
if a comic that's reviewed doesn't measure up, it's not worth reading...never
got into the question of what wasn't reviewed (and actually made the point of
saying it excluded books not yet read).

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)