>Didn't you just do the same thing you insulted Paul O'Brian over:
>paraphrasing something someone said to create a "strawman argument?"

I don't think they're comparable, but then, I likely wouldn't, would I? But I
do think there's a reasonable difference between taking a statement and
rephrasing it so it means something it never, ever implied...and taking
something that's stated pretty clearly and questioning its implications.

>P.S. Just read Strange #1 from the online link. Loved it. Really
>well done. I'm curious as to how you and Sam Barnes are splitting the
>writing duty.

She (and it's Samm) writes half, and I write half, then we revise each other's
stuff to make it feel consistent.


jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)