|>Didn't you just do the same thing you insulted Paul O'Brian over:
>paraphrasing something someone said to create a "strawman argument?"
I don't think they're comparable, but then, I likely wouldn't, would I? But I
do think there's a reasonable difference between taking a statement and
rephrasing it so it means something it never, ever implied...and taking
something that's stated pretty clearly and questioning its implications.
>P.S. Just read Strange #1 from the online link. Loved it. Really
>well done. I'm curious as to how you and Sam Barnes are splitting the
She (and it's Samm) writes half, and I write half, then we revise each other's
stuff to make it feel consistent.
(all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)